« Phpmyadmin tutorial part_1 / English
How To Install MySQL 5 on Windows 2008 Server – Part 2 »

James Burke takes us Inside the Apollo Command Module

James Burke takes us inside a replica of the apollo command module

Duration : 0:3:50


[youtube -fs8gkiap6U]

This entry was posted on Thursday, March 11th, 2010 at 8:39 am and is filed under module. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

24 Responses to “James Burke takes us Inside the Apollo Command Module”

  1. I thought the …
    I thought the commander sat in the middle and the command module pilot sat in the left.

    Do you have a video for the lunar module?

  2. sardoniclysane on March 11th, 2010 at 8:39 am

    The lunar rocks …
    The lunar rocks brought back from the various missions are available to the public (to an extent) and have been analyzed by thousands of scientists world wide in the past 40 years. Don’t you think someone would have found something amiss if they weren’t lunar rock?

    Also, what solar flare are you referring to? There was no significant solar flares at the time the Astronauts were on the moon.

  3. DictionRedaction on March 11th, 2010 at 8:39 am

    Yes, because they …
    Yes, because they say so moron. They don’t pass out the moon rocks like library books.

    We no “testes” by ourselves padre.

  4. Lordje, why would …
    Lordje, why would you need proof?
    What do you know about solar flares? Prove to me that they were active (and dangerous) during the Apollo missions.

  5. lordjealousisthinker on March 11th, 2010 at 8:39 am

    timbolimbo1 I …
    timbolimbo1 I believe in American exceptualism!

    This believe is also shared by Adlf Hitler and Zionists

    whom they Believe in German Arain exceptualism, and Jewish exceptualism respectively

  6. lordjealousisthinker on March 11th, 2010 at 8:39 am

    dopje31857 {The 880 …
    dopje31857 {The 880 pounds of moonrocks brought back to earth are the most obvious evidence.}

    The Question is:- what make you believe that these rocks are from the moon and not Volcanic Basalt Rocks from Hawaii?

    Just because they say so without you testes by yourself??

    The solar flair alone would Make it Impossible for amon to be in the moon With this Primitive appollonian technologies }

  7. As alijanlondon …
    As alijanlondon said the naysayers are not anti-american at all, most of the time they are american themselves.

  8. Bye Analmu. Please …
    Bye Analmu. Please ask the nurse to check your chains.

  9. ammannuTheFIRST on March 11th, 2010 at 8:39 am

    dopje31857

    Third …
    dopje31857

    Third Point “TRUTH” does not come with group mentality factor or multibe attestaions of CIA pre-paid AstroNUTS and so called scientist…if multibe attestaion is a FACTOR of knowing the TRUTH ,why dont you take the pharaoh -Egyptian or Mesopotamians accounts on creations, the flood (epic of Gilgamesh) , and their gods names they are recorded in multiple attestation accounts and, curved in stones

  10. So you call …
    So you call scientists in 40 countries worldwide jerks?
    Are all these men and women payed by NASA to keep out the truth?
    You are a silly bastard.

  11. Don’t forget that …
    Don’t forget that most of the naysayers and conspiracy theories originate from america. As well as the “waste of money” chanters. You should look closer to home before lashing out at the rest of the world

  12. The point is by …
    The point is by saying {The 880 pounds of moonrocks brought back to earth } are nOt strong evidence that man had landed on the moon

    Only jerks belivieved so

  13. If robots would …
    If robots would have to bring back 880 pounds of moonrock how many of these unmanned missions you think would be needed? 40? 130?

  14. dopje {Several …
    dopje {Several lines of solid & scientific evidence point to an actual moonlanding. The 880 pounds of moonrocks brought back to earth are the most obvious evidence. }

    NOT REALLY… COZ unmanned soviets spacecraft Luna 16, Luna 20 and Luna 24 , collected samples of lunar soil and return them to Earth, by 1970. The program returned 0.326 kg of lunar samples. The Luna missions were the FIRST space-exploration sample return missions to rely solely on advanced robotics NOT MAN

  15. Over the past …
    Over the past decade, moonhoax advocates have brought up many intriguing points regarding the Apollo missions to the moon. None of them, however, are indisputable evidence of fraud, and most are misunderstandings of basic physics or mission specifications. Several lines of solid & scientific evidence point to an actual moonlanding. The 880 pounds of moonrocks brought back to earth are the most obvious evidence. More than 30,000 pictures were brought back and hours of video.
    The hoax is a hoax.

  16. Excellent x3!
    Just …
    Excellent x3!
    Just what I was looking for,thanks for posting!

  17. first of all you …
    first of all you should learn to speak english, second, all the rocks, experiments still operating. and they werent made in a ceramics lab like that moron next to his kiddy pool thinks. i hope buzz punches you like he did siebrel

  18. also, people dont …
    also, people dont realize that the space program has similar side effects as a war, in which it gave a boost to the economy by employing thousands of people to build all the machines. Except no one was purposly killed.

  19. where is your …
    where is your TESTABLE evidence / proof ???
    :)

  20. where is your …
    where is your TESTABLE Proves ???

  21. We DID put 12 men …
    We DID put 12 men on the surface of the moon.

    Deal with it.

  22. Technology ( …
    Technology (particularly computers and medical diagnostics)..granted would not exist if it weren’t for the technology developed specifically for Apollo.*** I DONT THINK SO
    ….we can talk/ discuss about that later and argue about it ..and see how valid your argument is

    BUT The Question is

    DID they really PUT a man on the moon?

    :+D

  23. LOL hahahaha… You …
    LOL hahahaha… You are very ignorant.

    Did you know that we are still reaping benefits from this project forty years later? A good portion of the technology (particularly computers and medical diagnostics) you take for granted would not exist if it weren’t for the technology developed specifically for Apollo.

    I remember people complaining about the money spent on space back in the 60’s-70’s. But how much benefit did we reap from the welfare state and entitlement programs they were crying for?

  24. ‘Yeah, the idea of …
    ‘Yeah, the idea of WINGED spacecraft, that is REUSABLE? That’s crazy talk! If we could do it then, why can’t we do it now? And don’t get me started on the computers, your head implant has more memory then the entire spacecraft! Must have been a hoax.’

    And that is what they will say. Seems silly now, it will be silly then, but I bet some schill will make money off of it.

Leave a Reply